E E-turo
← Back to the gallery View the Markdown source

Offline Classroom Activities — Mathematics 6

Term 1 · Week 7 · Multiplying Any Combination · CG Quarter 1, competency 11

Five activities: three individual, two group. Every one of them runs with no electricity, no devices and no printing budget.

Activity Time Grouping Best used
I-1 The Four-Piece Rectangle 25 min Individual Day 1 — replaces the digital game
I-2 Conversion Sprint 15 min Individual Day 2 — fluency, run twice
I-3 The Whole-Number Hunt 25 min Individual Day 4 — extension
G-1 The Rectangle Wall 35 min Groups of 5 Day 3 — consolidation
G-2 Costing the Tarpaulin 40 min Teams of 5–6 Day 5 — application

Preparing the squared paper (once, reused all week)

Grade 6 needs squares more than Grade 5 did, because the four-piece rectangle is only convincing when the pieces can be counted. If you have no squared paper:

About 4 gridded sheets per learner covers the week.


INDIVIDUAL ACTIVITIES

I-1 · The Four-Piece Rectangle

Time 25 minutes · Grouping Individual · Use Day 1, replaces the digital game

The learner draws the thing that makes the misconception impossible to hold.

Materials

Preparation

None. Write the five problems on the board.

Instructions

For each problem: draw the rectangle, cut it into four, label every piece, total them. Then check by converting to improper fractions.

Problem The four pieces Total Check by improper
1 2½ × 1⅓ 2 · ½ · ⅔ · ⅙ 3⅓ 5/2 × 4/3 = 20/6
2 1½ × 2¼ 2 · 1 · ¼ · ⅛ 3⅜ 3/2 × 9/4 = 27/8
3 2⅓ × 1½ 2 · 1 · ⅓ · ⅙ 7/3 × 3/2 = 21/6
4 1¼ × 1⅘ 1 · ⅘ · ¼ · ⅕ 5/4 × 9/5 = 45/20
5 3½ × 1½ 3 · 1½ · ½ · ¼ 7/2 × 3/2 = 21/4

(Teacher's copy. Learners get column 2 only.)

Row 5 is the awkward one and it is deliberate. Its four pieces are 3 × 1 = 3, 3 × ½ = 1½, ½ × 1 = ½ and ½ × ½ = ¼. The second piece is itself a mixed number, which learners find unsettling — a piece of the answer looking like the question. It is correct, and saying so is the moment the method stops feeling like a trick.

The question to ask while circulating

"Point at the piece you would have missed on Monday."

A learner who cannot point at it has drawn the picture without connecting it to the error. That is the Day 2 small group.

Differentiation

Group Adjustment
Below level Rows 1–3, halves and quarters. Pre-drawn rectangles so only the cutting and labelling is required
On level All five
Above level All five, then: "Draw 2⅓ × 2⅕. How many pieces? Why still four, and never more?"
Additional needs Enlarged grids; pieces pre-outlined; labels may be dictated to a peer scribe

Assessment — 10 points

Criterion Points
Five rectangles drawn and cut into four 2
All four pieces labelled correctly on at least three rows 3
Totals correct (1 point each, 5 rows) 3
Improper-fraction check shown and agreeing 2

Written Works.


I-2 · Conversion Sprint

Time 15 minutes · Grouping Individual · Use Day 2 — and again on Day 4

Conversion is not the competency, but every failure of the competency this week traces back to it. Fifteen minutes of pure fluency, run twice in the week, buys more than an hour of product practice.

Materials

Instructions

Part A — mixed to improper. Two minutes. Then swap and mark.

2½ = 5/2 3¾ = 15/4 1⅚ = 11/6 4⅔ = 14/3 2⅗ = 13/5
5½ = 11/2 1⅞ = 15/8 3⅓ = 10/3 2¼ = 9/4 6⅖ = 32/5

Part B — improper to mixed. Two minutes.

7/2 = 13/4 = 20/6 = 3⅓ 11/3 = 3⅔ 27/8 = 3⅜
9/5 = 1⅘ 22/7 = 3 1/7 15/2 = 45/20 = 52/5 = 10⅖

Part C — the trap. One minute, and it is worth the whole activity:

Which of these is not equal to the others? 2½  ·  5/2  ·  2.5  ·  2/5  ·  250%

Answer: 2/5. Everything else is the same quantity in different clothes — which is Quarter 2's whole subject arriving eight weeks early.

(Teacher's copy throughout. Learners get the left of each equals sign.)

How to run it

Time it strictly, swap papers, mark from the board, and record only the class total, not individual scores. This is a warm-up, not a test, and learners who know it is not being recorded will work faster and reveal more.

Run it again on Day 4 and compare the class total. That comparison is the evidence.

Differentiation

Group Adjustment
Below level Part A only, first row only, untimed
On level Parts A and B timed, Part C together
Above level Add: "Write 20/6 in three different ways that are all correct." (20/6, 10/3, 3⅓)
Additional needs Untimed; verbal answers accepted

Assessment

Not scored individually. Record the class total on Day 2 and Day 4.


I-3 · The Whole-Number Hunt

Time 25 minutes · Grouping Individual · Use Day 4, extension

Runs the topic backwards. The answer is given; find the question. This is where a learner stops executing the rule and starts seeing inside it.

Materials

Instructions

Both numbers must be mixed numbers (a whole part and a fraction part). Find pairs whose product is exactly a whole number. Show the improper form that proves it.

Target Find at least
3 3 pairs
4 3 pairs
6 2 pairs

Answer key

Not exhaustive — accept any pair of mixed numbers that multiplies correctly.

Target Valid pairs Improper form Check
3 2¼ × 1⅓ 9/4 × 4/3 36/12 = 3
1¼ × 2⅖ 5/4 × 12/5 60/20 = 3
1⅔ × 1⅘ 5/3 × 9/5 45/15 = 3
2⅔ × 1⅛ 8/3 × 9/8 72/24 = 3
4 2½ × 1⅗ 5/2 × 8/5 40/10 = 4
1½ × 2⅔ 3/2 × 8/3 24/6 = 4
3⅓ × 1⅕ 10/3 × 6/5 60/15 = 4
2⅖ × 1⅔ 12/5 × 5/3 60/15 = 4
6 2½ × 2⅖ 5/2 × 12/5 60/10 = 6
2¼ × 2⅔ 9/4 × 8/3 72/12 = 6
1½ × 4 rejected: 4 is not a mixed number

The strategy worth surfacing at the end

Ask how learners found their pairs. Two methods appear, and the second is the prize:

  1. Guess and check. Convert, multiply, see. Slow but honest.
  2. Build it from the cancelling. For the product to be whole, the denominators must both cancel. So pick the first fraction — say 9/4 — and then the second must contain a 4 on top and a factor of 9 on the bottom: 4/3 works, because 4 cancels the 4 and 3 goes into 9.

Method 2 is factor reasoning, and it is what Grade 6 Quarter 4's GCF work is for. A learner who finds it should explain it slowly to the class.

Assessment

Open task, three bands:

Band Evidence
Extending Met every target, found the cancelling method, can explain it
Secure Met every target by guess and check, all products verified
Developing Met some targets; the improper conversions are correct where attempted

GROUP / TEAM ACTIVITIES

Both assume a crowded room with fixed desks. Neither requires learners to move furniture.


G-1 · The Rectangle Wall

Time 35 minutes · Groups of 5 · Use Day 3, consolidation

Six groups, six rectangles, one wall display that stays up for the rest of the term.

Materials

Preparation

Write the assignments on the board before the class comes in.

Group Product Answer
1 1½ × 1½
2 2½ × 1½
3 1⅓ × 2¼ 3
4 2⅓ × 1½
5 1¾ × 2⅔ 4⅔
6 2⅕ × 1½ 3 3/10

Roles — assign one to each member, do not let them volunteer

Role Responsibility
Drafter Draws the rectangle to scale and cuts it into four. Draws nothing else
Labeller Writes the dimension of each side and the area of each of the four pieces
Adder Totals the four pieces, showing the common denominator. May not use the improper method
Checker Independently converts to improper fractions and multiplies. Signs the sheet
Reporter Presents to the class and answers one question from another team

The split between Adder and Checker is the whole design: the two methods must be performed by two different people, so that agreement is evidence rather than assumption.

Instructions

  1. 5 min — roles assigned, rectangle drawn to scale.
  2. 15 min — cut into four, label, total.
  3. 8 min — Checker converts and multiplies independently. If the two answers disagree, both people work again — the group may not simply take one.
  4. 7 min — sheets taped up in order, Reporters present.

Answer key — the four pieces

Group Product Four pieces Total Improper check
1 1½ × 1½ 1 · ½ · ½ · ¼ 3/2 × 3/2 = 9/4
2 2½ × 1½ 2 · 1 · ½ · ¼ 5/2 × 3/2 = 15/4
3 1⅓ × 2¼ 2 · ¼ · ⅔ · 1/12 3 4/3 × 9/4 = 36/12
4 2⅓ × 1½ 2 · 1 · ⅓ · ⅙ 7/3 × 3/2 = 21/6
5 1¾ × 2⅔ 2 · ⅔ · 1½ · ½ 4⅔ 7/4 × 8/3 = 56/12
6 2⅕ × 1½ 2 · 1 · ⅕ · 1/10 3 3/10 11/5 × 3/2 = 33/10

Group 3's answer is exactly 3, and Group 5's has a mixed number among its pieces. Both groups will suspect an error. Both are right. Have those two Reporters go last, so the class has settled before the surprises arrive.

Managing 45+ learners at fixed desks

Six groups of five leaves room for more — add 1⅖ × 2½ (= 3½) and 3¼ × 1⅓ (= 4⅓) as groups 7 and 8. Nobody moves; the group is whoever is within reach, and the sheet passes along the row.

Differentiation

Group Adjustment
Below level Assign group 1 or 2 — halves only, smallest pieces
Above level Assign group 5 or 6, and ask them to predict a seventh product without drawing it
Additional needs The Adder and Checker roles are entirely written; the Drafter role can use a pre-ruled grid

Assessment — group rubric, 12 points

Criterion 3 2 1
Rectangle To scale, cut correctly into four, legible from the back of the room Correct but not to scale Wrong number of pieces
Labelling All four pieces and both dimensions labelled correctly One label wrong or missing Several missing
Two methods agree Both performed independently and agree, with working shown for each Agree, but one is thin Only one method attempted
Roles Every member did their own role only Roles blurred once or twice One or two members did everything

Performance Tasks.


G-2 · Costing the Tarpaulin

Time 40 minutes · Teams of 5–6 · Use Day 5, application

The week's arithmetic inside a job that gets done in every barangay before every fiesta.

Materials

Preparation — 5 minutes

Write on the board:

TARPAULIN PRINTING — PRICE LIST

  Printing        ₱ 180 per square metre
  Eyelets         ₱ 12 each
  Hemming         ₱ 45 per metre of edge

Roles

Role Responsibility
Reader Reads each requirement aloud and states what must be computed. May not compute
Measurer Works out areas and edge lengths
Coster Turns measurements into pesos
Checker Recomputes every figure independently. Signs each line
Reporter Presents and answers one question
Timekeeper (6th) Calls the halfway point and the two-minute warning

Instructions

Part 1 — 12 min. One banner. The barangay wants a tarpaulin 2½ m wide and 1½ m tall. Find its area, then the printing cost.

Part 2 — 14 min. The full job. The same banner needs hemming all the way round and an eyelet every half-metre of edge. Find the perimeter, the hemming cost, the number of eyelets, and the total.

Part 3 — 8 min. The decision. A second design is 3 m × 1¼ m. Which banner has the larger area? Which costs more in total? Are those the same answer? Explain.

Part 4 — 6 min. Reporters present Part 3. Take three teams.

Answer key

Part 1 — the banner

Step Working Answer
Area 5/2 × 3/2 = 15/4 3¾ sq m
Printing 180 × 15/4 = 2700/4 ₱675

Part 2 — the full job

Step Working Answer
Perimeter 2 × (2½ + 1½) = 2 × 4 8 m
Hemming 45 × 8 ₱360
Eyelets 8 ÷ ½ 16
Eyelet cost 12 × 16 ₱192
Total 675 + 360 + 192 ₱1 227

Part 3 — the decision

Banner A — 2½ × 1½ Banner B — 3 × 1¼
Area 15/4 = 3¾ sq m 15/4 = 3¾ sq m
Printing ₱675 ₱675
Perimeter 2 × 4 = 8 m 2 × 4¼ = 8½ m
Hemming ₱360 45 × 17/2 = ₱382.50
Eyelets 8 ÷ ½ = 16 → ₱192 8½ ÷ ½ = 17 → ₱204
Total ₱1 227 ₱1 261.50

The two banners have exactly the same area and different costs, and that is the entire point of Part 3. Same 3¾ sq m, same printing bill — but B is longer and thinner, so it has more edge, and edge is what hemming and eyelets are sold by. A team that answers "the bigger one costs more" has not read the question; the areas are identical.

Expect at least one team to insist the areas differ. Have them show their working — it is almost always 3 × 1¼ computed as 3¼.

Managing 45+ learners at fixed desks

Teams are rows. Only the Reader and Reporter stand. With more than eight teams, run Part 4 with four reporters and collect Part 3 in writing from the rest.

Differentiation

Group Adjustment
Below level Parts 1 and 2 only, with the area calculation modelled on the board first
On level Parts 1–3
Above level Add Part 3b — "Design a banner with the same 3¾ sq m area and the lowest possible total cost. Justify the shape." (A square-ish 2 m × 1⅞ m has the least perimeter of the practical options)
Language support The Reader role may be performed in the mother tongue; the written record is in English
Additional needs Coster may use a calculator; Reporter may present from written notes

Assessment — group rubric, 12 points

Criterion 3 2 1
Part 1 Area and cost both correct, working shown One correct Neither
Part 2 Perimeter, hemming, eyelets and total all correct Two or three correct One or none
Part 3 reasoning Recognises the areas are equal and explains that cost differs because of edge, not area Notices the totals differ, explanation thin Claims the areas differ
Roles and verification Every role performed; Checker signed each line Roles blurred, checking partial One or two members did everything

Performance Tasks.


Which activity to reach for

If your class… Run
Has no devices at all I-1 on Day 1 and I-2 on Days 2 and 4 — together they replace the game
Still produces part-by-part answers after Day 2 I-1 again, rows 1–3, with pre-drawn rectangles
Is slow and inaccurate rather than confused I-2. The problem is conversion fluency, not understanding
Finished early and is restless I-3. It has no ceiling
Needs the term performance-task mark G-1 or G-2 — both rubric-scored and defensible as Performance Tasks
Has one 40-minute slot and nothing prepared G-2. The only preparation is three lines on the board

Part of the E-turo MATATAG artifact set. Companion files: lesson-plan.md · lesson-plan-ilaw.md · syllabus.md · assessment.md · slides.html · game.html · worksheet.html