E E-turo
← Back to the gallery View the Markdown source

Offline Classroom Activities — Science 10

Term 1 · Week 2 · CG Quarter 1, competency 2 · Plate boundaries

Three individual and two group activities. No electricity, nothing to buy, no laboratory equipment. All five are written for a room of 45 or more with fixed desks.

Two cautions before any of these.

The first is about people. Activity 4 asks learners to find the hazards near where they live. In this country some of them will have lost a home, a school or a family member to an earthquake, an eruption or a landslide. Say at the start, to the whole class, that anybody may work on a different part of the archipelago without giving a reason — so that nobody has to explain themselves in front of the room to avoid a map of their own province.

The second is about fire. Activity 3 uses a candle. It is the only naked flame in the week and the safety notes in it are not a formality.


Activity 1 — Build the Table (group)

Time 35 minutes
Group size 5 — works at 4 to 6
Materials Paper. Two sheets and one book per group for demonstrating
Preparation Five minutes: draw an empty three-by-four table on the board — boundary, movement, structure, events.

The point

The class builds the week's table instead of copying it. Nothing goes on the board that a group cannot defend, and a row that the class successfully challenges comes back down.

Roles — everybody has one

Role What they do How many
Modeller Demonstrates the group's boundary with the paper and the book, to the group first and then to the class 1
Structure Writer Writes what forms there. One line, no more 1
Events Writer Writes what happens there. One line, no more 1
Challenger Argues against the group's own row before it goes up, and reports what could not be defended 1
Reporter Takes the row to the board and answers the class's questions 1

With four, the Challenger and the Reporter combine — and if a group has to drop one role, it must not be the Challenger.

Instructions

  1. Each group is given one boundary: divergent, transform, or one of the three kinds of convergence. With five groups every case is covered once.
  2. Model it with the paper and the book until every member of the group can do it.
  3. Fill your row: movement, structure, events.
  4. The Challenger argues against every entry. Anything that cannot be defended comes off.
  5. The Reporter puts the row on the board and takes questions from the class.
  6. Every learner copies the finished table — all five rows — into their own notes.

The two questions the class should ask every group

a. "Which object moves, and which way?" Every row must answer this before anything else.

b. "Does anything sink? How do you know?" This is the question that separates the three kinds of convergence, and a class that asks it of all five groups will notice on its own that one convergent row answers no — which is the whole difficulty of the week, discovered rather than announced.

Rubric — 12 marks

Criterion 3 2 1 0
The model was made Every member can demonstrate it with the paper and the book Most members can One member can Nobody demonstrated
The row is complete Movement, structure and events, all three, all correct Two of the three One Boundary name only
It was challenged first The Challenger reports at least one entry that was changed or dropped Entries were argued The Challenger read the row back No challenge
Everybody worked All five roles carried out Four Three One person did it all

Activity 2 — Three Kinds of Toward (individual)

Time 25 minutes
Materials Two sheets of paper and one book with a hard cover, per learner or per pair. Paper and pencil for drawing
Preparation Two minutes: check that every learner has something rigid to use as the book.

The three models

Model 1 — continent meets continent. Two sheets of paper flat on the desk, edge to edge. Push them together slowly.

Model 2 — ocean meets continent. One sheet flat, the book resting on one end. Push the paper toward the book.

Model 3 — ocean meets ocean. Two sheets, one lying slightly over the edge of the other. Push them together. One goes under.

Instructions

  1. Do each model. Draw what you saw — a side view, three drawings.
  2. On each drawing, label: which way each plate moved, whether anything went down, and where the trench would be if there is one.
  3. For each, write what forms and what happens there.
  4. Answer: which of the three has no trench, and why?
  5. Answer: which two have volcanoes, and where does the molten rock come from?
  6. Write one sentence saying what the paper and the book each stand for, and one thing the model gets wrong.

Why steps 4 and 6 are the activity

Steps 1 to 3 are the drill and most of the class will do them correctly. Step 4 is the competency — it is the only place a learner has to notice that one convergent case behaves in the opposite way from the other two.

Step 6 is the science. Every model is wrong somewhere, and saying where is a skill the guide asks for by name in the performance standard: use models to explain. The honest answers here are that paper is not thick or heavy in the way crust is, the desk is not the asthenosphere, and the push comes from a hand rather than from the plate's own weight.

Differentiation

One step down Models 1 and 2 only, steps 1 to 4, with the drawings supplied to label rather than drawn from scratch.
One step up Model 2 again, and mark on the drawing where the earthquakes would be at three different depths. Then say what the pattern of depths tells you about the angle the plate goes down at.

Assessment

Seen What it means
Three drawings labelled, step 4 answered with nothing sinks The competency is met with understanding
Three drawings correct, step 4 answered because it is different The observation without the reason. Ask which plate would have to sink and why it will not
A trench drawn on model 1 The diagnostic. The learner has drawn what a convergent boundary is supposed to look like instead of what their own hands just did
Step 6 blank Ordinary, and worth going back for. Ask one question: is the desk the asthenosphere?

Activity 3 — The Bowl That Circulates (individual)

Time 20 minutes
Materials A shallow metal tin of water — a clean sardine or milk tin. A candle stub. A few grains of rice, or tea leaves, or a pinch of dried herbs
Preparation Ten minutes: set the tin on stones or a tripod with the candle beneath one end only. Fill it about two centimetres deep.

⚠️ Fire, and it is the only one this week. The teacher lights the candle and the teacher puts it out. No learner reaches across it. The tin gets hot and stays hot for several minutes after the flame is out — say so before, not after. Do not run this in a room without a clear path to the door.

Instructions

  1. Scatter the grains on the water. Watch them sit still.
  2. Predict, in writing: what will the grains do when one end is heated?
  3. The teacher lights the candle under one end only.
  4. Watch for three minutes. Write down what the grains do — where they rise, where they travel, and where they sink.
  5. Draw the loop.
  6. Answer: nothing was pushed. What made the water move?
  7. Answer the hard one below.

The hard question

The plates move on the asthenosphere, and the asthenosphere is solid rock. This bowl is full of liquid water. So what exactly is this a model of?

Say the limitation before the flame is lit, not afterwards. What the bowl shows is that a hotter part of a material rises and a cooler part sinks, and that this makes a loop. What it does not show — and what a learner may honestly conclude from it if nobody says otherwise — is that a material has to be liquid to do that.

Hot solid rock flows. Glacier ice flows downhill for years without ever melting. The asthenosphere does the same thing, far slower and far hotter, and the evidence that it is solid is that S-waves cross it, which they could not do if it were liquid.

A model that is quietly wrong teaches the wrong thing quietly. This one is worth running anyway, because the circulation is real and visible and no diagram conveys it. It is only worth running with the limitation said out loud.

Assessment

Seen What it means
The loop drawn correctly and the limitation stated in the learner's own words Full understanding, and the modelling skill the performance standard asks for
The loop drawn correctly, the hard question answered it is a model of the mantle Half. True, and it does not engage with the difference
This proves the mantle is liquid The exact failure the warning exists to prevent. It is the teacher's fault, not the learner's, and it is fixable in one sentence
Prediction written after the flame was lit Ask for a prediction on the next practical and mean it

If there is no candle, no tin and no rice

Hold a hand above a hot pot in the kitchen at home and feel the rising air; the loop is the same and it cannot be drawn from watching. Or simply run the activity as steps 6 and 7 in discussion, with the drawing done from the class's own descriptions of a pot of boiling water. It is weaker, and it is honest to say so — the grains circulating are the part that convinces.


Activity 4 — Reading the Archipelago (group)

Time 35 minutes
Group size 6 — works at 5 or 7
Materials A map of the Philippines showing mountains, faults, volcanoes and trenches — one per group. If there is none, a hand-drawn outline on the board and one shared printed copy
Preparation Fifteen minutes: obtain or draw the map. See the note below.

This activity previews Week 3's competency and it is placed here on purpose. Competency 3 asks learners to interpret this country's features in relation to plate tectonics, and interpretation needs this week's table. Doing a first pass now means Week 3 starts from reading rather than from labelling.

About the map

A real map is needed and this pack does not supply one. PHIVOLCS publishes maps of active volcanoes, faults and trenches, and a division office or a school atlas will have something usable.

An outline copied onto the board carries most of the activity — the coastline, the main island groups, and the features marked as the class finds them. What it cannot carry is scale and precision, so a group should not be asked to measure anything from it. Say which map you are using and what it can and cannot support.

Roles — everybody has one

Role What they do How many
Locator Finds each feature on the map and points to it 1
Classifier Says which boundary type would produce it, using the class table 1
Challenger Asks how do you know for every classification 1
Recorder Writes the group's list: feature, location, boundary type 1
Direction Reader Works out which way the plates must be moving for that feature to be there 1
Reporter Takes one finding to the class in one sentence 1

Instructions

  1. Find and mark: one trench, one volcano, one mountain range, one fault.
  2. For each, the Classifier names the boundary type that produces it and the Challenger asks how they know. The reason goes in the record, not just the answer.
  3. The Direction Reader says which way the plates must be moving for each.
  4. Answer: how many different boundary types can you find evidence for in this one country?
  5. Answer: what does that tell you about where this archipelago sits?
  6. Each learner writes the group's four findings and one sentence answering step 5.

The answers to steps 4 and 5

More than one. Trenches and volcanoes are convergent; a long fault system running through the islands is transform motion. That combination is unusual and it is the reason for the curriculum guide's phrase "geologically dynamic".

Step 5: this archipelago sits where several plates meet, and it is being built and shaken by that meeting continuously. The features on the map are not scenery — they are the record of the process, and they are still happening.

Rubric — 12 marks

Criterion 3 2 1 0
Four features found All four, located and named Three Two Fewer than two
Each one classified with a reason Every classification has a how do you know recorded Most have reasons One reason given Names only
Direction worked out Movement direction given for all four Two or three One Not attempted
Step 5 answered More than one boundary type, and what that means for this country More than one type identified One type identified Not addressed

Activity 5 — Five Claims (individual)

Time 15 minutes
Materials Paper and pencil
Preparation None.

The five statements

Each one is wrong. All five are said by adults, printed in books, and drawn in diagrams.

  1. "The plates float on a sea of molten magma."
  2. "Wherever two plates crash together, you get a trench."
  3. "The plate boundary runs along the coastline."
  4. "Nothing happens at a transform boundary, because nothing is built there."
  5. "Volcanoes only happen where plates crash together."

Instructions

  1. For each, write one sentence saying what is wrong with it.
  2. For each, write one sentence saying what the speaker should have said instead.
  3. For statement 1, write the evidence — not just the correction.
  4. Choose the one you think you were closest to believing at the start of the week. Not marked.
  5. Write one sentence explaining statement 2 to somebody in Grade 7.

The answers

# What is wrong What to say instead
1 The asthenosphere is solid rock It flows extremely slowly while staying solid — and S-waves cross it, which they could not do through a liquid
2 Only where something sinks Two continental plates converging build mountains with no trench at all
3 Coastlines are made by sea level The Mid-Atlantic Ridge is a boundary thousands of kilometres from any coast
4 Nothing built is not nothing happening Shallow earthquakes, close to the surface, close to where people live
5 Divergent boundaries erupt more or less continuously That is how ocean floor is made — gently, which is why nobody pictures it

Why step 4 is unmarked and asked anyway

Naming the misconception you were closest to is the beginning of not making it, and a learner being graded on the answer will pick a safe one. Say it is unmarked before they start, and mean it.

Assessment

Step 5 is the one to read. Explaining to a younger learner why some collisions make trenches and others do not, without the words subduction or density, is genuinely difficult — and a learner who manages it has the idea rather than the vocabulary.

Seen What it means
All five corrected, step 3 gives the S-wave evidence, and step 5 is clear to a younger reader Full understanding
All five corrected, step 3 says only it is solid The claim without the evidence. It is the difference between knowing and being able to show
Statement 2 defended Convergent is still one thing. It is the most persistent of the five and it needs Activity 2 again, not another explanation
Statement 1 defended Ordinary. It is in a great many published diagrams, drawn in orange, and correcting it once is not enough

If there are no books, no candle and no map


Part of the E-turo MATATAG artifact set. Companion files: syllabus.md · lesson-plan.md · lesson-plan-ilaw.md · worksheet.html